On doing the thing that needs to be done when you notice it

The best advice in David Allen’s productivity book (or “bible,” to the many who have a cultlike affinity for it) Getting Things Done has nothing to do with his complex organizational framework. It’s a simple heuristic: If a task will take you less than two minutes, do it now. It’s what has me emptying the … Continue reading On doing the thing that needs to be done when you notice it →

On the thoroughness of hospital staff

When our first kid was born, my experience in the hospital was a rush—I was anxious, exhausted, overstimulated. My attention span was short, and my short term memory was shot. Names of nurses and doctors? Forgotten. A play-by-play commentary later requested by family? Impossible. So I was delighted that the experience of accompanying my wife … Continue reading On the thoroughness of hospital staff →

On Dan Heath’s 3 barriers to upstream problem-solving

Since I finished Dan Heath's thoughtful book Upstream a few weeks ago, I've been more or less continuously meditating on his premise of "upstream" problem-solving. Heath suggests that everyone spends too much time solving problems once they have become problems rather than solving problems before they happen. It would be wonderful, of course, if we … Continue reading On Dan Heath’s 3 barriers to upstream problem-solving →

What if context switching is part of my job?

One of the most powerful shortcuts to greater work productivity is simple: avoid context switching. Related to multitasking—the fool's errand of attempting to do two (or more!) things at once—context switching is switching different work contexts: screen and paper, Outlook and Teams, Word and Excel, etc. The problem with context switching? "Attention residue." Every time … Continue reading What if context switching is part of my job? →

How many people does it take to “make a tiger”?

I came across a wonderful Chinese proverb recently—one of those proverbs mysterious enough to demand an explanation and, even better, deliver with an excellent historical parable. From Wikipedia: "Three men make a tiger" refers to an individual's tendency to accept absurd information as long as it is repeated by enough people. It refers to the … Continue reading How many people does it take to “make a tiger”? →