On the foot

The foot was just another one of those things from childhood that you never really think about.

I knew it was weird, of course—not every family has a mummified human foot displayed in their living room—but I never considered it as much more than an oddity.

That is, until the other morning, driving back from daycare drop-off, when I tuned into an NPR piece on how the Natural History Museum had committed to repatriating the thousands of human remains in its collection.

I gasped.

The foot.

Now, there’s really no explaining the foot in a factual way—the best I can do is offer the mythical Coe family version that I know:

My great-great-grandfather was something of a notable New Yorker—board member of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, that sort of thing. Think: wealthy white man in the Gilded Age. You know.

The story I heard is that an acquaintance—with some connection to the Natural History Museum—had gifted him a mummified foot.

Allegedly, the foot had fallen off the mummified remains of an “Indian princess,” as workers were transferring the body into the museum.

And what better gag gift than a mummified foot?

Like I said, childhood stories have a way of avoiding the thinking that we develop later in life.

As I type this out, I have to wince at both the outlandishness of it as well as my own family’s fallibility in holding onto this foot for generations.

It suddenly seemed obvious: we had to do something about the foot.

I called my dad, who likewise winced at the new context—our oddball family relic turned, or rather re-turned, into what it is: human remains.

We agreed that something needed to be done—the foot had to end its run as a Coe family oddity and be what it’s always been: a piece of human remains.

Leave a comment